Head-to-Head Comparison

FTMO vs SabioTrade

An honest, data-driven comparison to help you pick the right prop firm. We compare drawdown rules, challenge costs, profit splits, trading conditions, and more — no bias, just facts.

F

FTMO

4.8

The most established and trusted prop trading firm with rigorous but fair evaluation process. Known for excellent support and reliable payouts.

Visit FTMO
S

SabioTrade

4

Modern prop firm with proprietary trading platform, offering streamlined evaluation and competitive trading conditions.

Visit SabioTrade

Side-by-Side Comparison: FTMO vs SabioTrade

Metric
FTMO
SabioTrade
Max Drawdown
10%
10%
Daily Drawdown
5%
4%
Profit Target
10%
10%
Profit Split
80/20 → 90/10
80/20 → 90/10
Challenge Cost
$155 - $1,080
$119 - $899
Trading Period
Unlimited
30 days
Min Trading Days
4
3
Leverage
1:100
1:100
Instruments
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto, Stocks
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto
Account Sizes
$10K, $25K, $50K, $100K, $200K
$20K, $50K, $100K, $200K
Scaling
Scale up to $2M after 4 months of profitable trading
Scale based on performance metrics
News Trading
Allowed
Allowed
Weekend Holding
Allowed
Allowed
EA / Bots
Allowed
Not Allowed
Rating
4.8/5
4/5

The Verdict: FTMO vs SabioTrade

The best choice depends on your trading style, risk tolerance, and goals. Here's our breakdown by trader profile:

Best for Beginners
SabioTrade

SabioTrade offers lower entry costs, making it easier for newer traders to get started.

Best for Aggressive Traders
FTMO

FTMO provides 10% max drawdown allowance, giving aggressive trading styles more breathing room.

Best for Long-term Scaling
FTMO

FTMO offers better scaling potential: Scale up to $2M after 4 months of profitable trading.

Best for Overall Value
FTMO

FTMO earns 4.8/5 in our analysis, with a strong balance of rules, cost, and trader experience.

FTMO Pros & Cons

Most trusted name in prop trading
Generous scaling plan up to $2M
Free retake if profit target met
Excellent educational resources
Reliable monthly payouts
Higher challenge fees than some competitors
Strict evaluation process
10% profit target can be demanding
No swing trading during news

SabioTrade Pros & Cons

Proprietary trading platform
Clean UI and experience
Good range of instruments
Up to 90% profit split
Modern tech infrastructure
EAs not allowed
30-day evaluation limit
Higher entry costs
No third-party platforms
Newer company

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, FTMO or SabioTrade?
It depends on your trading style. FTMO offers 10% max drawdown and a 80/20 → 90/10 profit split, while SabioTrade offers 10% max drawdown and a 80/20 → 90/10 split. FTMO has a higher overall rating at 4.8/5.
What is the cheapest option between FTMO and SabioTrade?
FTMO challenges start at $155 - $1,080, while SabioTrade starts at $119 - $899. Compare account sizes and what's included before choosing based on price alone.
Can I use EAs or trading bots with FTMO and SabioTrade?
FTMO allows EAs/bots. SabioTrade does not allow them. Always verify the latest rules on each firm's website.
What are the drawdown rules for FTMO vs SabioTrade?
FTMO has a 10% max drawdown and 5% daily drawdown. SabioTrade has a 10% max drawdown and 4% daily drawdown. Use our free Drawdown Calculator to find your safe lot size for either firm.
How long do I have to pass the FTMO vs SabioTrade challenge?
FTMO gives you Unlimited. SabioTrade gives you 30 days. Both require a minimum of 4 and 3 trading days respectively.
Which firm has a better profit split, FTMO or SabioTrade?
FTMO offers a 80/20 → 90/10 profit split, while SabioTrade offers 80/20 → 90/10. Higher profit splits mean more of your trading profits go to you.

Not sure which firm to pick?

Use our free tools to calculate your exact safe lot size and simulate your challenge before committing.

We may earn a commission if you sign up — our rankings remain unbiased.

Verified & Transparent
Data verified daily • Affiliate links disclosed • No hidden bias

Keep Researching

Compare FTMO with Other Firms

Compare SabioTrade with Other Firms

Popular Prop Firm Comparisons