Head-to-Head Comparison

FundingPips vs For Traders

An honest, data-driven comparison to help you pick the right prop firm. We compare drawdown rules, challenge costs, profit splits, trading conditions, and more — no bias, just facts.

FundingPips

4.3

Provides various evaluation models with scaling systems and profit splits ranging from 60-100% across major CFD categories.

Visit FundingPips

For Traders

4.1

Accessible and beginner-friendly firm supporting forex, crypto, and futures with fast 48-hour guaranteed payouts.

Visit For Traders

Side-by-Side Comparison: FundingPips vs For Traders

Metric

FundingPips

For Traders

Max Drawdown

10%

Daily Drawdown

Profit Target

Profit Split

80/20 → 100/0

70/30 → 90/10

Challenge Cost

$36 - $499

$9.99 - $499

Trading Period

Unlimited

Min Trading Days

Leverage

1:100

Instruments

Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto

Forex, Crypto, Futures

Account Sizes

$5K, $10K, $25K, $50K, $100K

$3K, $6K, $10K, $25K, $50K, $100K

Scaling

Scale to $2M with consistent performance

Progressive scaling with milestones

News Trading

Allowed

Weekend Holding

Allowed

EA / Bots

Allowed

Rating

4.3/5

4.1/5

The Verdict: FundingPips vs For Traders

The best choice depends on your trading style, risk tolerance, and goals. Here's our breakdown by trader profile:

Best for Beginners

For Traders

For Traders offers lower entry costs, making it easier for newer traders to get started.

Best for Aggressive Traders

FundingPips

FundingPips provides 10% max drawdown allowance, giving aggressive trading styles more breathing room.

Best for Long-term Scaling

FundingPips

FundingPips offers better scaling potential: Scale to $2M with consistent performance.

Best for Overall Value

FundingPips

FundingPips earns 4.3/5 in our analysis, with a strong balance of rules, cost, and trader experience.

FundingPips Pros & Cons

Profit split up to 100%

No time limit on evaluation

Multiple challenge models

Low minimum trading days

Good platform options

Some hidden consistency rules

Lower starting profit split

Can be confusing program choices

Support response times vary

Relatively new brand

For Traders Pros & Cons

Very affordable entry from $9.99

48-hour guaranteed payouts

Multiple asset classes

Beginner-friendly

No time limits on evaluation

Lower starting profit split (70%)

Some platforms exclude US traders

Less established brand

Limited educational content

Some programs have restrictions

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, FundingPips or For Traders?

It depends on your trading style. FundingPips offers 10% max drawdown and a 80/20 → 100/0 profit split, while For Traders offers 10% max drawdown and a 70/30 → 90/10 split. FundingPips has a higher overall rating at 4.3/5.

What is the cheapest option between FundingPips and For Traders?

FundingPips challenges start at $36 - $499, while For Traders starts at $9.99 - $499. Compare account sizes and what's included before choosing based on price alone.

Can I use EAs or trading bots with FundingPips and For Traders?

FundingPips allows EAs/bots. For Traders allows them. Always verify the latest rules on each firm's website.

What are the drawdown rules for FundingPips vs For Traders?

FundingPips has a 10% max drawdown and 5% daily drawdown. For Traders has a 10% max drawdown and 5% daily drawdown. Use our free Drawdown Calculator to find your safe lot size for either firm.

How long do I have to pass the FundingPips vs For Traders challenge?

FundingPips gives you Unlimited. For Traders gives you Unlimited. Both require a minimum of 3 and 3 trading days respectively.

Which firm has a better profit split, FundingPips or For Traders?

FundingPips offers a 80/20 → 100/0 profit split, while For Traders offers 70/30 → 90/10. Higher profit splits mean more of your trading profits go to you.