Head-to-Head Comparison

FundingPips vs Lux Trading Firm

An honest, data-driven comparison to help you pick the right prop firm. We compare drawdown rules, challenge costs, profit splits, trading conditions, and more — no bias, just facts.

FundingPips

4.3

Provides various evaluation models with scaling systems and profit splits ranging from 60-100% across major CFD categories.

Visit FundingPips

Lux Trading Firm

4.2

Premium prop firm with accounts up to $1M and scaling to $10M. Uses a professional A-book model with dedicated risk managers and static 6% drawdown.

Visit Lux Trading Firm

Side-by-Side Comparison: FundingPips vs Lux Trading Firm

Metric

FundingPips

Lux Trading Firm

Max Drawdown

10%

Daily Drawdown

None

Profit Target

10%

Profit Split

80/20 → 100/0

80/20

Challenge Cost

$36 - $499

$299 - $4,999

Trading Period

Unlimited

Min Trading Days

Leverage

1:100

1:10

Instruments

Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto

Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals

Account Sizes

$5K, $10K, $25K, $50K, $100K

$100K, $400K, $1M

Scaling

Scale to $2M with consistent performance

Scale up to $10M by consistently earning 10% on funded account

News Trading

Allowed

Not Allowed

Weekend Holding

Allowed

EA / Bots

Allowed

Not Allowed

Rating

4.3/5

4.2/5

The Verdict: FundingPips vs Lux Trading Firm

The best choice depends on your trading style, risk tolerance, and goals. Here's our breakdown by trader profile:

Best for Beginners

FundingPips

FundingPips offers more forgiving drawdown rules, making it easier for newer traders to get started.

Best for Aggressive Traders

FundingPips

FundingPips provides 10% max drawdown allowance, giving aggressive trading styles more breathing room.

Best for Long-term Scaling

FundingPips

FundingPips offers better scaling potential: Scale to $2M with consistent performance.

Best for Overall Value

FundingPips

FundingPips earns 4.3/5 in our analysis, with a strong balance of rules, cost, and trader experience.

FundingPips Pros & Cons

Profit split up to 100%

No time limit on evaluation

Multiple challenge models

Low minimum trading days

Good platform options

Some hidden consistency rules

Lower starting profit split

Can be confusing program choices

Support response times vary

Relatively new brand

Lux Trading Firm Pros & Cons

Massive scaling potential up to $10M

Static 6% drawdown (no trailing)

Starting accounts up to $1M

Dedicated risk manager assigned

One-step evaluation process

Mandatory stop-loss on every trade

No automated trading or HFT

Single-trade profit capped at 5% of target

Very strict risk management rules

Higher challenge fees

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, FundingPips or Lux Trading Firm?

It depends on your trading style. FundingPips offers 10% max drawdown and a 80/20 → 100/0 profit split, while Lux Trading Firm offers 6% max drawdown and a 80/20 split. FundingPips has a higher overall rating at 4.3/5.

What is the cheapest option between FundingPips and Lux Trading Firm?

FundingPips challenges start at $36 - $499, while Lux Trading Firm starts at $299 - $4,999. Compare account sizes and what's included before choosing based on price alone.

Can I use EAs or trading bots with FundingPips and Lux Trading Firm?

FundingPips allows EAs/bots. Lux Trading Firm does not allow them. Always verify the latest rules on each firm's website.

What are the drawdown rules for FundingPips vs Lux Trading Firm?

FundingPips has a 10% max drawdown and 5% daily drawdown. Lux Trading Firm has a 6% max drawdown and no daily drawdown limit. Use our free Drawdown Calculator to find your safe lot size for either firm.

How long do I have to pass the FundingPips vs Lux Trading Firm challenge?

FundingPips gives you Unlimited. Lux Trading Firm gives you Unlimited. Both require a minimum of 3 and 0 trading days respectively.

Which firm has a better profit split, FundingPips or Lux Trading Firm?

FundingPips offers a 80/20 → 100/0 profit split, while Lux Trading Firm offers 80/20. Higher profit splits mean more of your trading profits go to you.